| Author | Comment | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
 UGA 95 |
Would you..... |
Lead | ||
|
Cheat on
for this chick? |
||||
|
|
||||
|
dncdawg |
#1 | |||
|
Posts: 7104 03/18/10 11:20 |
Given that chick A now looks like this:
probably. However, chick B wouldn't be worth more than a romp or two in the sack. |
|||
|
|
||||
|
Leghumper83 |
#2 | |||
|
Posts: 1034 03/18/10 11:52 "Official Dawgs Den DDS, MD" |
no
Customer: "He's not pining! He's passed on! This parrot is no more! He has ceased to be! He's expired and gone to meet his maker! He's
a stiff! Bereft of life, he rests in peace! . . . His metabolic processes are now history! He's off the twig! He's kicked the bucket, he's shuffled
off his mortal coil, run down the curtain and joined the bleeding choir invisible! This is an ex-parrot!"
|
|||
|
|
||||
|
g8trh8tr |
#3 | |||
|
Posts: 1251 03/18/10 1:17 |
Hell no.
|
|||
|
|
||||
|
crispy |
#4 | |||
|
Posts: 881 03/18/10 10:52 |
Even without the tats, chick B would still be sub-par compared to A.
|
|||
|
|
||||
|
UGA 95 |
#5 | |||
|
It's not even close to me. Girls with tats are a turnoff for me. Face tats seal the deal. And how can you not love Sandy? (Thats what we call her in the business.)
 |
||||
|
|
||||
|
g8trh8tr |
#6 | |||
|
Posts: 1251 03/19/10 1:35 |
UGA 95 wrote: I totally agree. I hate tats. That being said, I still kinda have a thing for this chick. But she'd be so much hotter without the tats.  |
|||
|
|
||||
